Soldiers’ Experiences during WWII
- Rosie Jayde Uyola
- Apr 9
- 3 min read
Essential Question: What can we learn from analyzing soldiers’ experiences on the front lines, and how can different types of primary sources help us understand historical events?

Learning Objectives
I can analyze different types of primary sources to understand the experiences of soldiers during World War II
I can evaluate how format and point of view influence the meaning of a historical source
I can support a claim using visual and written evidence from the front lines
Standards
NYS Social Studies Framework 11.7a
C3 Framework D2.His.4.9-12
Hess Cognitive Rigor Matrix Level 4: Compare diverse primary sources, analyze point of view, evaluate the role of format in shaping historical memory
Materials
Warm-Up Prompt
Vocabulary and Context Handout
Primary Source A: Letter from a U.S. soldier (Battle of the Bulge)
Primary Source B: WWII frontline photograph (U.S. soldiers in combat)
Dual-Source Comparison Organizer
Exit Ticket
FFW (5 min, 10 sentences): Do you learn more from a photograph or a personal letter? Which one helps you feel connected to a historical event, and why?
Historical Context
Today we are going to explore two different types of primary sources — a soldier’s letter and a wartime photograph. Both show us what life was like on the front lines, but each one uses a different format. You will analyze each source, then decide how they work together to help us understand World War II.
Vocabulary in Context – Soldiers’ Experiences
Word | Definition | Example (from sources) | My Sentence |
Front lines | The area where active fighting is happening | “We were ordered to dig in at the front lines” | _________________ |
Exhaustion | Extreme physical or mental tiredness | “We had marched all night through the snow” | _________________ |
Morale | The emotional and mental condition of a group | “Morale was low, but we refused to quit” | _________________ |
Perspective | A point of view or position from which something is observed | “The photo shows a different perspective than the letter” | _________________ |
Evidence | Information that supports a claim or idea | “This letter is evidence of daily life in combat” | _________________ |
Close Read: Dual Primary Source Analysis
Primary Source A – Letter from U.S. Infantryman, Battle of the Bulge (December 1944)
Source: U.S. Army Center of Military History
“We have been marching for two nights straight. The snow is waist deep in places. Our gear is frozen and our hands are raw. The men are holding on, but barely. We lost three from my unit yesterday. I have not slept in over forty-eight hours.
We were supposed to push forward this morning, but the Germans hit us before dawn. Morale is low, but no one is giving up. We still believe in what we are fighting for.”
Primary Source B – Photograph: U.S. Soldiers in Combat, Belgium, 1945
Photographer: Office of War Information Source: Library of Congress


Dual-Source Comparison Organizer (Student Handout)
Question | Source A – Soldier’s Letter | Source B – Photograph |
What details describe the front lines? | _______________________ | _______________________ |
What emotions or challenges are shown? | _______________________ | _______________________ |
What do we learn about morale? | _______________________ | _______________________ |
What does this source leave out? | _______________________ | _______________________ |
Which source feels more personal? Why? | _______________________ | _______________________ |
Group Discussion and Analysis
Turn to a partner. Use your organizer to compare your answers. Then answer the synthesis question together
Analysis Question: How do the letter and the photograph work together to help us understand the experience of soldiers in World War II?
Exit Ticket
FFW (5 min, 10 sentences): Choose one detail from the letter and one detail from the photo. Explain how they help you understand what life was like for U.S. soldiers on the front lines. Use at least one vocabulary word.
Today we combined two sources to understand the physical and emotional experience of fighting in World War II. This is the kind of thinking historians do: using different formats, comparing perspectives, and drawing conclusions based on evidence.