top of page
Search

Civic Essay: Peer Revision Workshop

  • Writer: Rosie Jayde Uyola
    Rosie Jayde Uyola
  • 2 days ago
  • 4 min read

Learning Target: I can improve my own historical essay by using the "Praise, Question, Suggestion" protocol to review a classmate's draft.



Essay Revision Pairs: Different Rubric Scores

Pair

Students

Task

1

Raja Cabrera + Nykel Dukes

Essay revision / peer feedback

2

Ali Camara + Muhammad Hamza

Essay revision / peer feedback

3

Tyler Carr + Corey Dunbar

Essay revision / peer feedback

4

Diarra Sene + Craig Enriquez

Essay revision / peer feedback

5

Angel Tejada + Vanessa Guzman

Essay revision / peer feedback

6

Jesly Santana + Angel Polanco

Essay revision / peer feedback

7

Mikeal Saunders + Mizarely Santiago

Essay revision / peer feedback

Missing Assignment Groups

Group

Students

Task

8

Emmanuel Amoateng + Jaime Batiz

write essay today

9

Zayetzi Colin + Emry Davila

write essay today

10

Jaden Henriquez + Epiphanie Hien

write essay today

11

Yeimer Medina Medina + Rayna Pasha

write essay today

12

Zaire Price-Tracey + Arieanah Stewart + Malia Vanzie

write essay today



Literacy Learning Targets:

  • Reading & Listening: I can spot the difference between pure description and deep analysis by reading my partner's draft and listening to their feedback.


  • Writing & Speaking: I can fix the weak points in my writing by speaking constructively with my partner and rewriting my essay based on their suggestions.

Part 1: DO NOW (Write Before You Speak)


Prompt: What is the point of revision?


Why do we revise an essay instead of just turning in the first draft?

Protocol:

  • Step 2: Partner A reads their answer to Partner B.

  • Step 3: Partner B reads their answer to Partner A.

  • Step 4: Whole Class Share-Out. (Be prepared: If called upon, you will share your partner's answer with the class, not your own!)


Part 2: Description vs. Analysis (Class Model)

A strong historical essay doesn't just list facts (description); it explains why those facts matter and how they prove the argument (analysis).

Draft 1:


The women's suffrage movement happened in the early 1900s. Alice Paul started the National Woman's Party. On March 3, 1913, she organized a massive parade in Washington D.C. In 1917, women stood outside the White House holding signs. They were called the Silent Sentinels. Woodrow Wilson was the president at this time. Carrie Chapman Catt was the leader of a different group called NAWSA. They went to different states like New York and Colorado to get voting laws passed. The 19th Amendment was finally ratified on August 18, 1920.

Draft 2:


The women's suffrage movement achieved success in the early 1900s because activists used two very different, but effective, political strategies. Alice Paul started the National Woman's Party to force immediate federal action through radical public protests. On March 3, 1913, she organized a massive parade in Washington D.C., and in 1917, the "Silent Sentinels" stood outside the White House holding signs. These aggressive tactics were designed to embarrass President Woodrow Wilson during World War I and keep the issue constantly in the national press. Meanwhile, Carrie Chapman Catt led NAWSA using a more moderate approach. They went to different states like New York and Colorado to get voting laws passed locally. By winning suffrage state-by-state, NAWSA slowly built the necessary political power in Congress to eventually force the passage of a national law. Ultimately, it was the combination of Paul's radical pressure and Catt's diplomatic state campaigns that led to the ratification of the 19th Amendment on August 18, 1920.


Part 3: Peer Feedback (Praise, Question, Suggestion)

Directions: Swap essays with your partner. Read their draft carefully. Then, fill out the feedback form below. You must be specific about their historical argument!

1. PRAISE (Identify a strength)

Sentence Starter: One specific piece of historical evidence you used really well was...


2. QUESTION (Identify a confusing or unsupported point)

Sentence Starter: I am a little confused about... OR Can you explain how this evidence connects to the prompt?


3. SUGGESTION (Provide an actionable step for revision)

Sentence Starter: To make this essay stronger, I suggest you add... (more historical context / deeper analysis about / a clearer topic sentence).


Part 4: Stuck? Use These Revision Questions!

If you or your partner are unsure how to improve the writing, pick one of these focus questions to evaluate the paragraph:

  • Evidence Check: Did the writer actually name a specific historical actor, event, or law (like Alice Paul or the 19th Amendment), or are they just using vague terms like "the people" or "the protests"?

  • The "So What?" Test: Read the last sentence of the paragraph. Does it just tell me a final fact, or does it explain why that fact matters to the overall essay topic?

  • Connection Check: How does the evidence in this specific paragraph directly prove the main argument of the Civic Literacy prompt?

  • Context Building: Imagine the reader has never taken U.S. History. What background facts do they need to know first before this paragraph makes total sense?


Part 5: Independent Revision


Directions: Review the feedback your partner gave you in Part 3 and the questions in Part 4.


Before you begin rewriting your final draft, what are the top two specific changes you are going to make to your essay right now?















 
 

“Our histories never unfold in isolation. We cannot truly tell what we consider to be our own histories without knowing the other stories. And often we discover that those other stories are actually our own stories.”

Angela Y. Davis

Thank you for contacting Rosie Jayde Uyola

© 2035 by Rosie Jayde Uyola

bottom of page