top of page
Search

8.8 The Vietnam War

  • Writer: Rosie Jayde Uyola
    Rosie Jayde Uyola
  • Apr 1
  • 16 min read

Updated: 21 hours ago


Learning Objective I: Explain the causes and effects of the Vietnam War.


Learning Target: I can compare the Vietnamese and American Declarations of Independence. I can explain how the Vietnam War caused social unrest on the American home front.


Vietnam War on the Home front Stations Activity



Declaration of Independence of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam


For the people of Vietnam, who were just beginning to recover from five years of ruthless economic exploitation by the Japanese, the end of World War II promised to bring eighty years of French control to a close. As the League for the Independence of Vietnam (Vietnam Doc Lap Dong Minh Hoi), better known as the Viet Minh, Vietnamese nationalists had fought against the Japanese invaders as well as the defeated French colonial authorities. With the support of rich and poor peasants, workers, businessmen, landlords, students, and intellectuals, the Viet Minh (led by Ho Chi Minh) had expanded throughout northern Vietnam where it established new local governments, redistributed some lands, and opened granaries to alleviate the famine. On September 2, 1945, Ho Chi Minh proclaimed the independent Democratic Republic of Vietnam in Hanoi’s Ba Dinh square. The first lines of his speech repeated verbatim the famous second paragraph of America’s 1776 Declaration of Independence.

 

All men are created equal. They are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, among them are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."


This immortal statement was made in the Declaration of Independence of the United States of America in 1776. In a broader sense, this means: All the peoples on the earth are equal from birth, all the peoples have a right to live, to be happy and free.


The Declaration of the French Revolution made in 1791 on the Rights of Man and the Citizen also states: “All men are born free and with equal rights, and must always remain free and have equal rights.”


Those are undeniable truths.


Nevertheless, for more than eighty years, the French imperialists, abusing the standard of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, have violated our Fatherland and oppressed our fellow-citizens. They have acted contrary to the ideals of humanity and justice.


In the field of politics, they have deprived our people of every democratic liberty.

They have enforced inhuman laws; they have set up three distinct political regimes in the North, the Center and the South of Vietnam in order to wreck our national unity and prevent our people from being united.


They have built more prisons than schools. They have mercilessly slain our patriots; they have drowned our uprisings in rivers of blood.


They have fettered public opinion; they have practiced obscurantism against our people.

To weaken our race they have forced us to use opium and alcohol.

In the field of economics, they have fleeced us to the backbone, impoverished our people, and devastated our land.


They have robbed us of our rice fields, our mines, our forests, and our raw materials. They have monopolized the issuing of bank-notes and the export trade.


They have invented numerous unjustifiable taxes and reduced our people, especially our peasantry, to a state of extreme poverty.


They have hampered the prospering of our national bourgeoisie; they have mercilessly exploited our workers.


In the autumn of 1940, when the Japanese Fascists violated Indochina’s territory to establish new bases in their fight against the Allies, the French imperialists went down on their bended knees and handed over our country to them.


Thus, from that date, our people were subjected to the double yoke of the French and the Japanese. Their sufferings and miseries increased. The result was that from the end of last year to the beginning of this year, from Quang Tri province to the North of Vietnam, more than two million of our fellow-citizens died from starvation. On March 9, the French troops were disarmed by the Japanese. The French colonialists either fled or surrendered showing that not only were they incapable of “protecting” us, but that, in the span of five years, they had twice sold our country to the Japanese.


On several occasions before March 9, the Vietminh League urged the French to ally themselves with it against the Japanese. Instead of agreeing to this proposal, the French colonialists so intensified their terrorist activities against the Vietminh members that before fleeing they massacred a great number of our political prisoners detained at Yen Bay and Caobang.


Notwithstanding all this, our fellow-citizens have always manifested toward the French a tolerant and humane attitude. Even after the Japanese putsch of March 1945, the Vietminh League helped many Frenchmen to cross the frontier, rescued some of them from Japanese jails, and protected French lives and property.


From the autumn of 1940, our country had in fact ceased to be a French colony and had become a Japanese possession.


After the Japanese had surrendered to the Allies, our whole people rose to regain our national sovereignty and to found the Democratic Republic of Vietnam.

The truth is that we have wrested our independence from the Japanese and not from the French.


The French have fled, the Japanese have capitulated, Emperor Bao Dai has abdicated. Our people have broken the chains which for nearly a century have fettered them and have won independence for the Fatherland. Our people at the same time have overthrown the monarchic regime that has reigned supreme for dozens of centuries. In its place has been established the present Democratic Republic.


For these reasons, we, members of the Provisional Government, representing the whole Vietnamese people, declare that from now on we break off all relations of a colonial character with France; we repeal all the international obligation that France has so far subscribed to on behalf of Vietnam and we abolish all the special rights the French have unlawfully acquired in our Fatherland.


The whole Vietnamese people, animated by a common purpose, are determined to fight to the bitter end against any attempt by the French colonialists to reconquer their country.

We are convinced that the Allied nations which at Tehran and San Francisco have acknowledged the principles of self-determination and equality of nations, will not refuse to acknowledge the independence of Vietnam.


A people who have courageously opposed French domination for more than eight years, a people who have fought side by side with the Allies against the Fascists during these last years, such a people must be free and independent.


For these reasons, we, members of the Provisional Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, solemnly declare to the world that Vietnam has the right to be a free and independent country—and in fact is so already. The entire Vietnamese people are determined to mobilize all their physical and mental strength, to sacrifice their lives and property in order to safeguard their independence and liberty.


Source: Ho Chi Minh, Selected Works Vol. 3, (Hanoi: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1960–62), 17–21.




In Congress, July 4, 1776


The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.


We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.


He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.


He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.


He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.


He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.


He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.


He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.


He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.


He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.


He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.


He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:


For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:


For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:


For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:


For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:


For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:


For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:


For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:


For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.


He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.


He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.


He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.


He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.


He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.


In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.


Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.


We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.



Discussion Questions:

  1. In what ways are the declarations similar? Different?

  2. What are the grievances of Ho Chi Minh?

  3. What is the historical situation of 1945? (consider how Japan’s imperialism during World War II led to Japanese occupation of the French Indochina colonies; consider the heightening tensions between the Soviet Union and the United States due to US fervor against communism in 1945).



Venn Diagram





Stations


Directions: Complete all of the stations. After you complete all of the stations, you will be required to write a thesis statement and one paragraph in response to the following prompt: Evaluate the extent to which the Vietnam War caused social unrest in the United States from 1964-1975.

 

Evaluate the extent to which the Vietnam War caused social unrest in the United States from 1964-1975.

 

Station #1 The Draft

The United States sent nearly 2.7 million Americans to Vietnam during the war. Many of these soldiers were drafted. This chart shows the lottery numbers. The highest lottery number called to duty was #195.

 

  1. Would you have been drafted?

 

 

  1. Americans could avoid or “dodge” the draft by being enrolled in college. What possible social unrest may arise due to these types of deferments? (Hint: Take a look at the graph below.)

 

 


Image Source: Brookings Institute 

 

Station #2 The Living Room War

The Vietnam War was referred to as the “Living Room War.”

 

  1. Why do you think the Vietnam War was referred to as the “Living Room War”?

 

  1. What can you infer about how the image below may contribute to the growing disapproval ratings of the Vietnam War in 1968?

 


“A man and a woman watching a film footage of the Vietnam war on a television in their living room.” (1968) Image Source: Library of Congress

 

Station #3 Tinker v. Des Moines

In 1965, Mary Beth Tinker and her brother were suspended after wearing black armbands to school in order to demonstrate against the Vietnam War. Her family sued the Des Moines Public School District. Watch this three minute video to learn more about the Tinker v. Des Moines case.


 

  1. How did the Tinker v. Des Moines case expand (or limit) the right of student speech?

 

  1. How does this case represent possible social unrest in the United States during the Vietnam War?

 


Station #4 The Vietnam War and Race

Martin Luther King Jr. and Muhammad Ali shared their thoughts on the relationship between the Vietnam War and American race relations.

 

  1. Briefly explain one similarity between Martin Luther King Jr.’s and Muhammad Ali’s arguments.

 

  1. Briefly explain one historical development from the 1960s that could be used to support Muhammad Ali’s argument.

 

 

“We are taking the young black men who had been crippled by our society and sending them 8 thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found [at home]. We have been repeatedly faced with the cruel irony of watching Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools.”--Martin Luther King Jr. (1967)

 

 


“Why should they ask me to put on a uniform and go ten thousand miles from home and drop bombs and bullets on brown people in Vietnam while so-called Negro people in Louisville are treated like dogs and denied simple human rights? But I have said it once and I will say it again. The real enemy of my people is right here. I will not disgrace my religion, my people or myself by becoming a tool to enslave those who are fighting for their own justice, freedom and equality…

 

If I thought the war was going to bring freedom and equality to 22 million of my people they wouldn’t have to draft me, I’d join tomorrow. But I either have to obey the laws of the land or the laws of Allah. I have nothing to lose by standing up for my beliefs. So I’ll go to jail. We’ve been in jail for four hundred years.”--Muhammad Ali (1967)




Station #5 1968: The Disapproval of American Involvement Grows

1968 proves to be an eventful year for the Vietnam War! The Tet Offensive began in January 1968 and continued for several months. In March, President Lyndon B. Johnson announced that he would not seek re-election for the presidency.


  1. Analyze the two graphs below. According to the first graph, how do the views of the Vietnam War progress (or change) during the duration of the war? What inferences can you make that would suggest WHY these changes in the views occurred?

 

 

  1. Make an inference about how the results of the first graph may have contributed to the results of the second graph.


Image Source: Pew Research

 

Image Source: Gallup

 

Station #6 1968: Chicago Democratic National Convention

Watch this two minute video about the riots at the Chicago Democratic National Convention.

 

  1. What is the historical situation of the 1968 Chicago Democratic National Convention?

 

 

  1. How might Americans view the Vietnam War after watching television coverage of the Chicago Democratic National Convention?

 

 

  1. How might Americans view the Democratic Party after watching television coverage of the Chicago Democratic National Convention?

 

 

 

Station #7 Kent State and Jackson State Student Protests

On April 30, 1970, President Nixon announced the American invasion of Cambodia. Students at universities protested against the escalation of the war. One of the most famous protests occurred at Kent State University on May 4th where four students were killed and nine were injured by the Ohio National Guard. Watch this six minute video to learn about the effects of this demonstration.


 

10 days after the killings at Kent State, two students were killed at Jackson State by police officers after protesting against the war. Watch this two minute video about the events of May 14, 1970 at Jackson State.


 

  1. May 4th is referred to as “The Day the War Came Home.” Why do you think it is referred to as this?

 

 

  1. Read this statement issued by the Ohio National Guardsmen who fired on students. What do you notice is included? What is missing?

 

 

  1. What do the Kent State and Jackson State student protests suggest about the American opinion of the Vietnam War?

 

 

 

Station #8 Protest Music

Choose one of the following songs. Listen to the song and read the lyrics (you can find all of the songs on YouTube).

 

Leaving on a Jet Plane (1966)

I Feel Like I’m Fixin’ to Die Rag (1967)

Draft Morning (1968)

The Unknown Soldier (1968)

Ohio (1970)

I Don’t Wanna Be a Soldier, Mama (1971)

Battle Hymn of Lt. Calley (1971)

What’s Going On (1971)

 

  1. What was the purpose of the song?

 

 

  1. Who was the intended audience of the song?

 

 

  1. What does this song suggest about the historical situation of when it was recorded?

 

 

 

 

Station #9 The 26th Amendment

“The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.”

--26th Amendment (1971)

 

  1. What is the historical situation of this source?

 

 

  1. What inference can be made about why the 26th Amendment was ratified during the Vietnam War?

 

 

Station #10 The Tonkin Gulf Resolution v. War Powers Resolution

The Tonkin Gulf Resolution and the War Powers Resolution serve as the two bookends of the Vietnam War in regards to the expansion and restriction of executive power. 

 

  1. What was the purpose of the Tonkin Gulf Resolution?

 

 

  1. What was the purpose of the War Powers Resolution?

 

 

  1. How do these two documents contrast?

 

 

Tonkin Gulf Resolution (1964)


That the Congress approves and supports the determination of the President, as Commander in Chief, to take all necessary measures to repel any armed attack against the forces of the United States and to prevent further aggression.


Section 2. The United States regards as vital to its national interest and to world peace the maintenance of international peace and security in southeast Asia. Consonant with the Constitution of the United States and the Charter of the United Nations and in accordance with its obligations under the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty, the United States is, therefore, prepared, as the President determines, to take all necessary steps, including the use of armed force, to assist any member or protocol state of the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty requesting assistance in defense of its freedom.

Section 3. This resolution shall expire when the President shall determine that the peace and security of the area is reasonably assured by international conditions created by action of the United Nations or otherwise, except that it may be terminated earlier by concurrent resolution of the Congress.

 

 

War Powers Resolution (1973)


The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces…


The President in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situation where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and after every such introduction shall consult regularly with the Congress until United States Armed Forces are no longer engaged in hostilities or have been removed from such situations…Within sixty calendar days after a report is submitted or is required to be submitted pursuant to section 4(a)(1), whichever is earlier, the President shall terminate any use of United States Armed Forces with respect to which such report was submitted (or required to be submitted), unless the Congress (1) has declared war or has enacted a specific authorization for such use of United States Armed Forces, (2) has extended by law such sixty-day period, or (3) is physically unable to meet as a result of an armed attack upon the United States. Such sixty-day period shall be extended for not more than an additional thirty days if the President determines and certifies to the Congress in writing that unavoidable military necessity respecting the safety of United States Armed Forces requires the continued use of such armed forces in the course of bringing about a prompt removal of such forces.

 



Now it is time to put everything together! Consider the historical developments that you learned about in these stations. Write a thesis statement and first body paragraph to the following prompt:

 

Evaluate the extent to which the Vietnam War caused social unrest in the United States from 1964-1975.

 

 



 
 

“Our histories never unfold in isolation. We cannot truly tell what we consider to be our own histories without knowing the other stories. And often we discover that those other stories are actually our own stories.”

Angela Y. Davis

Thank you for contacting Rosie Jayde Uyola

© 2035 by Rosie Jayde Uyola

bottom of page